| Legal Technology insider The legal technology information provider This issue: 208 (April 2008) | Next issue: 209 (29 May 2008) Advertising & editorial deadline for next issue: 23.05.08 Publisher & Editor: Charles Christian | Tel: 01986 788666 | Fax: 01986 788808 | Email: news@legaltechnology.com |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the monthly email newsletter for the award winning niche web site for legal technology and online legal services news and information. which has been described by The Times newspaper as the "the definitive online resource for the latest news about legal technology." Please forward this email to your colleagues. They can sign up for their own copy at www.legaltechnology.com/subscribe You'll also find lots more articles, case studies, jobs, the latest events or if you've missed an issue on our award winning niche web site - www.legaltechnology.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 in this issue of Legal Technology Insider: 1. PMS suppliers must try harder say LITIG 2. April's big deals 3. Now it's all change at TFB and SOS 4. Law firm IT roles - it pays to shop around 5. Opinion: Paper, paper everywhere... 6. IRIS Legal unveil latest strategy 7. Equitrac to spread the green message 8. Now ECHR is ging the MOSS route 9. Readers' poll: how much a day? 10. Legis 'alive and very well' Or log in to read this issue online: www.legaltechnology.com/latest > Headline stories > Other stories > News in brief > Opinion > People & places > Digital dictation news in brief > Job of the week ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regulars Useful links > Legal Technology web site > Contact us > Jobs > Latest events > The Orange Rag blog > All about the Insider ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Headline stories PMS suppliers
must try harder say LITIG The report suggests that ‘for existing legal industry suppliers to meet the challenge this presents, they need to spend more time with existing and potential client firms, understanding the current challenges facing the industry and the way law firms are trying to adapt their businesses to deal with this. It is no longer acceptable for suppliers to ignore the need for a system to deal with commoditised or volume business transactions, or the need to provide adequate information to manage the whole practice regardless of whether all areas time record.’ • The survey also found the minimum time organisations had been running their current PMS was 8 years and the average time was nearer 13 years. • Copies of
the LITIG report can be found on the Insider website (in the resources
section) and on the Orange Rag blog. LITIG welcomes all comments on the
report’s findings. One supplier that’s already commented is
Lexis Nexis Axxia, who say they welcome the report ‘as it has confirmed
our thoughts that we need to continue our drive to improve our customer
relationships and continually review our product roadmaps.’ Grindeys drop AIM
& switch to Axxia Collyer Bristow select
Aderant Two more wins for
Recommind Edgebyte win Jerusalem
site Although the deal has apparently caused some City IT directors to scratch their heads (for the record, ‘no’ this does not mean Tikit will be offering TFB’s Partner for Windows PMS to top 50 firms as an alternative to Elite or Aderant) the logic looks to be a win/win scenario for both sides. For Tikit it offers an opportunity to expand into the sub top 100 market (ie firms 101-to-500) which is TFB’s core regional practice/high street market. While for TFB, it means access to the Tikit portfolio of skills, services and products, so TFB will be able to offer its larger users the likes of industrial strength DMS, CRM and knowledge management systems. One aspect of the acquisition that did raise eyebrows is the fact TFB’s management had been banging on about the importance of independence ever since the CSG (and now IRIS) behemoth first strode into town. However at the moment the party line is TFB will remain an independent (or at least semi-autonomous) division within the Tikit Group. Also, both Simon Hill (managing director) and Mark Garnish (business development director) remain in the same roles at TFB as before – and both have signed long term contracts to remain with the company and become significant shareholders in the Tikit Group. Bucking the trend by not going for an acquisition was SOS (Solicitors Own Software) which saw founder and managing director Michael Platt bowing out for a undisclosed sum after a management buyout. The team effecting the MBO includes directors Keith Denman, Elaine Galvin, Graham Colbourne, Stephen Parry and David McNamara, formerly sales & marketing director who now becomes managing director. Platt said securing the independence of SOS was a paramount prerequisite for his retirement, while McNamara added “There has been widespread consolidation of software suppliers through recent mergers and acquisitions. We believe many firms will be let down as some legal software will inevitably be dropped and firms will be forced in a direction that they don’t necessarily want to take. Our MBO ceases any speculation that SOS users would suffer a similar fate and they can look forward to continued high levels of service and innovation in the years to come.” Falling into the category of the takeover also-rans, are the acquisitions of Digita International and Pinpoint Global. Digita (best known for its software for the accountants market – although its trusts system is used by some law firms, with top 150 firm Michelmores its flagship site) has been acquired by Thomson Tax & Accounting (not the same division that owns Elite) for an undisclosed sum. And, the e-discovery
start-up Pinpoint (no relation to the Quill Pinpoint service mentioned
elsewhere in this issue) has been bought by the US e-discovery and litigation
support systems vendor Epiq Systems (best known for its DocuMatrix software)
also for an undisclosed sum. All the senior management, including managing
director Greg Wildisen, are remaining with the business and will effectively
form Epiq’s London/international office. The pro forma revenue for
Pinpoint in 2007 was £1.1 million. Rates for IT directors average £130k, with a high of £205k and a low of £85k. For heads of IT/IT managers for a team of 4 plus, the average is £78k, with a high of £110k and a low of £60k, while for IT managers with teams of 3 or less, the average is £63k, with a high of £75k and low of £50k. Elsewhere in the jobs market a network/infrastructure manager should average £50k (high £75k, low £42k); an analyst programmer/developer £39k (high £55k, low £35k); and a PMS/DMS database administrator £39k (high £51k, low £31k). An IT training manager can expect to average £46k (high £66k, low £40k) while the rate for an IT trainer is £36k (high £42k, low £28k). On the support front, the average for network infrastructure analyst/3rd line support is £39k (high £60k, low £32k); for 2nd line/ desk support £30k (high £44k, low £23k) and for helpdesk analysts/1st line support £26k (high £33k, low £19k). • A full chart
of rates for 23 job titles can be downloaded from the Insider website
at www.legaltechnology.com The figures are based on London rates and JPL
suggest that for regional roles, a reduction of 5-to-10% is appropriate,
except for senior posts where salaries are very much consistent nationwide. AIM and TPS (the old Laserform Partnership Suite) users will be supported until July 2011 and can have a free software upgrade to IRIS Law when they are ready. Firms remaining with AIM or TPS after this date will be covered by a ‘vintage support’ programme but at an extra cost. Full details of the strategy, including IRIS documentation plus reader comment (including a posting by ACUA chair Dave Grattage) can be found on our Orange Rag blog. But, it will be market forces that determine the strategy’s success. Will existing users migrate to Enterprise and Business – or move elsewhere? More importantly, if the group is to grow rather than just consolidate, will new customers (those currently using non-IRIS systems) be attracted to IRIS Law? • IRIS Legal’s
Laserform division has launched a range of five probate practice checklists.
Called ProbatePro, these are the latest additions to Laserform’s
growing collection of litigation (LitPro) and residential conveyancing
(ConPro) out-of-the-box knowledge management/practice guides. ProbatePro
provides step-by-step guidance through the stages of applications for
probate and applications for letters of administration. They are fully
electronic, incorporating hyperlinks direct to the Non-Contentious Probate
Rules, case law, relevant Laserforms, associated websites and practices’
own in-house know-how. Rich explained that while the company’s traditional message (that it can count printer and photocopier volumes so the cost can be recharged on to clients) still remained valid – and could still deliver a return on investment within months in most organisations, what really excited customers now was the fact Equitrac systems could also help cut waste and thus help them meet their own ’green’ and ‘sustainability’ targets. For example, Equitrac systems can be configured to enforce a policy so all routine documents are printed duplex (ie on both sides). Equitrac is already working with the American Bar Association (ABA) on its environmental protection (EPA) ‘waste wise’ strategy that aims to reduce the amount of paper used in law offices (did you know that during its lifecycle, one ton of paper can generate 11 tons of CO2) and will be launching further initiatives. • As well as
spreading the green message, Equitrac continues to be active in its traditional
law firm market. Recent new wins in the UK for its Professional 5 (EP5)
system include Shepherd Wedderburn, Shakespeare Putsman, Vertex Law, Hamlins
LLP and Turbervilles, whilst firms upgrading from older Equitrac systems
to EP5 include Halliwells, Weightmans, Wollastons, Withers and Ward Hadaway.
UK sales for Equitrac are headed up by Peter Straughan: pstraughan@equitrac.com “We developed the solution using Sharepoint Workflow foundation and a series of MS SQL reporting tools so users can easily see the status of all workflows at any point in time. The Court uses four web services that allow us to seamlessly integrate our case management and document management databases. So, when a user wishes to send a document on an approval route, they right click on the document name from within the DMS and choose the option Start Workflow. This launches a web service that identifies the case associated with the document in the Court Case Management Information System (CMIS) and dynamically builds the route of the workflow based on the lawyers responsible and the supervisor for the case and the type of workflow (chamber or committee) they choose. “The document
is then managed by the MOSS workflow module until it is approved. Then,
the document is automatically converted from Word to PDF via a web service,
an electronic signature added and the final PDF document locked down by
the DMS, replacing the original Word version to ensure we have only one
copy of the final document. Where appropriate, the system also inserts
events, recording the decision taken into the CMIS database. Users can
easily see the status of workflows via the SQL reporting tool that resides
within a Sharepoint web page and also have the ability to click on ‘Tasks’
to find all outstanding workflows assigned to them. We are confident this
system will radically enhance the time spent processing cases, as well
as providing a valuable reporting tool to keep stock and measure the overall
case management functions of the Court.” For training services in London & SE, the most widely charge rate (45%) was between £751-£950 a day, followed by £501-£750 (30%), and £301-£500 (25%). We also had one firm that was paying in excess of £951 a day. As for expenses, 65% of respondees to the survey paid travel and expenses on top of these rates. The position was broadly mirrored over the rest of the UK with 45% paying £751-£950 a day, 25% on £501-£750 and 30% on £301-£500. However out of London & SE nobody was paying more than £950 and the percentage (55%) paying expenses was also marginally lower. For support, implementation and consultancy services, per day rates for London & SE varied from under £500 (6%) to £1501+ (also 6%) with the most widely quoted rate (44%) being £751 to £1000, followed by £501-£750 (26%) and £1001-£1500 (18%). Once again, it was a similar story across the rest of the UK, with rates in the £751-£1000 bracket the most widely cited (50%) followed by £501-£750 (33%), and £1001-£1500 (12%). There was nobody charging the top rate of £1500+ however 5% were paying £500 or less per day. The full results of the survey can be found on the Insider website. Curiously, far more firms outside the London & SE area (60%) are charged extra for travel and expenses, compared with those (just 39%) within that zone. Could the explanation be that because so many consultancies are based in London, they are happy to make travel (in many instances only a Tube or cab fare) inclusive but charge extra once their consultants are required to head into the nether regions beyond Potters Bar? • For this month’s
survey we are looking at how people like to receive their media –
including the Legal Technology Insider newsletter – in the digital
age. By email, via a blog or do you still prefer to have a hard copy version
because ‘you can’t take your laptop to the loo’. With modules already
available to handle personal injury, employment, conveyancing, probate,
commercial premise licensing and family law work, Legis has spent the
past 12 months developing LegisSQL2 for the broader/mid-sized market in
conjunction with systems integrator KsysLegal (01489 580290) and is now
planning an “aggressive marketing campaign”. Next up is Shephered
+ Wedderburn, who have implemented an EDMS (electronic document management
system) strategy in conjunction with Ricoh multifunctional devices, eCopy
and the firm’s Interwoven DMS. The firm came from a position in
which space restrictions meant 90% of its paper-based documents were held
in off-site storage and only the previous 12 months’ documents were
physically held on-site. Working with local EDMS specialists Capital Solutions,
the firm now uses a combination of Ricoh scanners and eCopy workflow software
to create an electronic document filing environment. According to IT director
Gary Alman, the new approach has reduced the volume of paper filing by
80%, while simultaneously streamlining data retrieval processes, and has
seen a 40% reduction in print volumes, as email can now be archived in
a digital rather than hard copy format. Finally, Microsystems
has just launched version 6.0 of its DocXtools document clean-up and quality
control system. The company say the new version can reduce by 70% the
time it takes to format a Microsoft Word 2003 or 2007 document. Co-op selects
will drafting system Added functionality
for Proclaim suite Open Text
secure two DMS sites Copitrak offering
EFI integration Swinton insures
debt with Linetime Quill going
green with Converge-IT Saturn 27
working with King on e-billing Carillion
ring right note for MMS Macfarlanes
refresh with Eurodata Howard Kennedy
sign up for Microsystems Norton Rose
select IntApp Visualfiles
battle it out with Tricostar ‘.NET
for Legal’ to preview in London Epona wins
in the Netherlands The number of pages sent and received via email is far greater than the pages communicated via letters in the ‘good old days’. And in many firms the majority of emails are printed and filed as hardcopy. Apart from the office space this requires, there is the time taken to process it all. Filing-related tasks can occupy up to 50% of a secretary’s working time, while even fee earners are spending up to three hours a week on filing and retrieval. So what can be done? Well, here are some of the steps that can be taken. For a project to be taken seriously, there needs to be a strong business case, typically based on cost savings. If you can quantify the cost of the current filing environment and the savings to be made by improving it, then a filing project can rise in the priority list. When undertaking this work for our clients, we have found some startling statistics that have made the partnership realise that ‘something must be done’. For example, in just the London offices of one global law firm we identified measurable savings of £350,000 per annum, not including the reduction in staff costs. I’ve already mentioned that email is often the source of paper filing, so if the need to file emails on paper can be turned off then the single biggest problem will be fixed. Most law firms have some form of document management system where electronic files can be stored, managed and retrieved. The problem is until recently these systems were unable to store large quantities of emails in a user-friendly and efficient fashion. It is almost as if the DMS vendors had been caught out by the growth of email as much as their customers. This is being fixed so, if you have not done so already, now is the time to look at upgrading your DMS to fully support email filing and retrieval. A DMS upgrade project will consume a lot of resource and time. In the meantime how can you reduce the flow of additional filing? One way is to look at your current filing related policies and make sure they are appropriate for your current business environment. Here are a couple of good practices which can help to reduce filing volume: • Make a clear definition between information that needs to be managed, namely records and information that is unmanaged – documents. A record, according to the ISO 15498 records management standard, is ‘information created, received, and maintained as evidence by an organisation or person in the transaction of business, or in the pursuance of legal obligations, regardless of media.’ Documents are pieces of information with no operational, regulatory or financial value. When a lawyer prints off an email, so they can read it more easily, they have created a document and it can be destroyed once it has served its short-term purpose. Copies of records are also classed as documents. So, when a matter is closed, if only the records are filed and all related documents are destroyed then filing volumes can be greatly reduced. • Review file
retention policies. Many firms have retention policies well beyond the
necessary period to meet business and regulatory requirements, which simply
clogs the system. Even when files reach the end of their retention period,
there is often reluctance to destroy them. It is good practice for the
filing staff to be able to destroy files without having to get explicit
permission from the relevant lawyer (subject to the appropriate business
processes being in place to ensure records have not been misfiled). • NewField IT
is a vendor-independent software and services provider that helps organisations
achieve control of document and print management costs. NewField have
a white paper on this topic called Legally Overweight? Optimising a law
firm's filing environment. To request a copy email legalinfo@newfieldit.com
or call 020 8948 9565. Skinner joins
Eclipse Thorpe to
head sales at Phoenix Tilling defects
to InterAction Hendricks
promoted at Hobs Legal Docs C-NLIS becomes
Land Data Rix &
Kay swap out SPS for nFlow Bighand in
at Connect2Law Oxfordshire
firm outsources to ‘genie’ |